We can help – 800-874-2124

Virtual Social Lives

From the Desk of Trine Syverinsen, Educational and Therapeutic Consultant

I was listening to KQED’s Forum on the drive in to work recently.  Michael Krasny was interviewing Stephen Marche, who has written an article in the Atlantic called “Is Facebook Making Us Lonely?” (link below)

I am an avid Facebook user, and find great joy in both sharing pictures and observations with friends near and far, and in reading about the activities of my Facebook “friends” on a regular basis. Both the “friends” that I see almost every day, the ones I see somewhat frequently, and the ones I haven’t met in years. I was in my thirties when I first got a Facebook account, so I have no idea how it would have influenced me back when I defined myself much more by my friends and my social life, but I am sure that it would have been a much more formative tool.

I know that for some of the teenagers and young adults that we work with, it is a real source of stress. It feels like a reflection of your social success, a public social calendar or report card, and an intense yet still disconnected arena for “likes” and “dislikes”. People fight, argue, date, love, break up, get married and divorced on Facebook. Maybe it is making us lonely – and more disconnected. But I also think it is making us do or say things that we wouldn’t have, if we were in the same room as our “friend.”

Sometimes hearing about adolescents and their experiences with cyber bullying makes me think about how unreal or virtual our nastiness or meanness can seem if it is texted, tweeted or posted on Facebook. I am sure that interacting socially through the computer makes us feel a little bit more removed from the consequences of our statements.

It also makes me think of the 1963 Milgram experiment out of Yale University, in which people were encouraged to provide what seemed like very painful electrical shocks to subjects, by pushing buttons. This was really a study in human obedience, investigating to what length people would go to inflict pain on others if they were reassured by perceived authorities that it was OK or necessary to do so. Part of the basis for the study was to understand the behaviors of individuals and guards in Nazi Germany.

However, part of what came out of this study was also that one of the few things that influenced whether an administrator of the shocks (called the Teacher) would interrupt the shocks or continue to the maximum level of volts was his proximity to the receiver of the shocks (called the Learner). I think it is fair to assume that we are more likely to be inappropriate or mean to people we can’t see or hear.

Everything is a computer these days: your phone, your car and soon your glasses. We can all probably benefit by being conscious of how disconnected and lonely being plugged in can make us.

Links:

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/05/is-facebook-making-us-lonely/8930/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment

Parents of Adopted Students Seek Help From Bodin

From the Desk of  Dr. Hillary French, Educational and Therapeutic Consultant

At any given time, about one third of teens and young adults who come to the Bodin offices are adopted.  I have always found this intriguing, wondering why is that?  Most of our teens have many common issues such as; psychiatric and emotional issues, behavioral issues, academic struggles/learning disabilities, and substance use/abuse among others, but why are a disproportionate amount of our clients adopted? First of all, I know that not every child who is adopted at birth has adoption issues. Thus, I am only speaking about those families walking through the doors of Bodin needing help.  I must admit upfront that my thoughts and theories are based upon observations and anecdotal evidence rather than pure research, but I have been a Psychologist and Educational Consultant here at Bodin long enough to draw some conclusions from these observations.

First, one might assume that these adopted students have an attachment disorder, specifically Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD), yet that is often not the case.  Actually, most of our adopted clients are adopted at birth. We do have  some students who are adopted later,  who were in orphanages or foster care for the first years of life, had pathogenic care; often neglected, unloved,  and enduring trauma of horrific kinds.  Then good-hearted, caring and eager parents adopt these children, assuming that with enough love, these kids are going to thrive. These students are the ones that break my heart the most, frequently the ones who need the most intense treatment and who often do have RAD.  But again, since most of our clients are adopted at birth, RAD isn’t the issue.

The question remains why do a disproportionate number of our students, who are adopted at birth, with no diagnosis of RAD, struggle significantly more than the average adolescent or young adult?  Why were things “just fine” until the teen years hit?  Then, what seems all of a sudden, the students who appeared  to have no blatant issues with being adopted or anything else, start to act out, use drugs, become promiscuous, self-harm, and begin failing in school? Let me first discuss why being adopted at birth may not make everything “okay.”  If you have read The Secret Life of the Unborn Child: How You Can Prepare Your Baby for a Happy, Healthy Life by Thomas Verny, MD (1982), Dr. Verny makes a convincing argument about how deep the bond between a mother and her child in utero is or is not. That book made a huge difference in my pregnancy with my son!  One such premise in the book is this: imagine, an expectant mom who is ambivalent about her pregnancy. There are a plethora of reasons that a mother will decide to give up her child for adoption. One can imagine that most women who make that choice experience a significant amount of stress over those 9 months, anxiety, depression, fear and doubt – financial stress, work and family/relationship stress. Then, all of mom’s stress hormones such as cortisol, epinephrine and norepinephrine get dumped into the baby’s blood stream and into a brain that is being developed.   How can a developing fetus not be affected in a neurological and biochemical way as that child grows inside his or her mother’s womb?

Secondly, there is the premise that an adopted child has a “primal wound,” as detailed in the book, The Primal Wound, Understanding the Adopted Child, by Judith Verrier, (1993). Essentially, she states that adopted children have this primal wound that festers and grows inside them.  The child was used to his/her biological mom’s voice, smells, tastes, and other familiarities in utero.  Verrier indicates that this bond is forged and reinforced over nine months, and lasts throughout the child’s entire life. Once that newborn is placed in the arms of a stranger upon birth, a loss is created that can be devastating and long-lasting.

Infants and small children are resilient and adaptable. If their basic needs are met, cared for and loved by their adoptive parents, they can thrive in life.  However, for many of our adopted clients, that “primal wound” is there, but may not manifest in any obvious form, until adolescence.  The root reason for why this occurs has everything to do with the main significant tasks of adolescence – Identify Formation and Separation.  In identify formation, teens have to find a clear sense of self; what are their values, ethics, beliefs and morals. What their social, cultural, ethnic, gender and sexual identity is and what makes them unique.  But this quest to define one’s identity is a challenge for the teen adoptee, who must determine who they are without the basic knowledge of where they came from.  Internally there is a huge struggle, how can they develop their identity if they know little about their history- who they are, who they look like/have characteristics of, and why their birth parents gave them up, to name a few!

 

The other hallmark task of adolescence is separation; the process of creating a distance between teens and their caregivers, and moving on to be responsible for themselves. Subconsciously, separation can remind the adolescent of rejection, that core issue in adoption, stemming back to the initial loss of their birth mother. Their independence can bring up feelings of abandonment, again tying back to that same loss.

 

Figuring out who you are and learning to become independent can be a challenge for any teen. However, a lot of adopted teens have this added layer that can make it a much more turbulent time. Perhaps it is so overwhelming many cannot manage and seek ways to mask their distress; push their adopted parents away and engage in unhealthy behaviors, such as drugs and self-harm.

 

This is a narrow explanation to a very complicated question.  I would welcome your thoughts on this as well! Perhaps my next blog will be what adoptive parents can do to help their child ease through adolescence a bit easier. Until then, I continue to do what I do with passion, dedication and admiration of all the families we assist here at Bodin.

The Fear of what might happen

From the desk of Trine Syverinsen, Educational and Therapeutic Consultant

 

The mass shootings in Norway last July and the more recent killings in Oakland are nothing but horrible. Being Norwegian, and having all of my family and many of my friends in Norway, it seemed even closer and more devastating, but most of my American friends have also been truly shocked.

 

How can one man cause so much pain, suffering, fear and death? And why, why, why would he target innocent, unarmed teenagers and young adults? There is this hope inside of me that, even inside the mind of a disturbed individual, there is a core of common decency or compassion, but that is of course not always true.

 

So, as we work through our grief and pain, and prepare to go on with our lives, the question is always what should we learn from this? What do we change to make sure this doesn’t happen again? How do we protect ourselves, and our kids? How do we make sure that they are safe?

 

And the truth is that we can’t.

 

In many ways, raising kids in particular, and just plain living in general, is a risk analysis game. The thing that happened at Utoya in Norway  statistically is not likely to ever happen (again). We can send our kids away to camp every summer for the rest of our lives, and there is an almost  zero chance that this will happen. But how do we address our fear of what is now proven Might Happen? The horrible things that will almost never happen to our kids are the ones that cause the most fear in us. Precisely because they are so horrible. The things that are more likely to happen do not have the same emotional response. This is completely understandable. Our stress level is set to respond differently to those 4 seconds when we think our child is lost in the department store than to a slight fever at night during cold season.

 

At Bodin we spend a lot of time talking to parents who are trying to sort out their feelings of fear and anxiety, and get  help in assessing the real risk their teenagers face. Some parents might have a slightly higher level of anxiety than might seem necessary, based on the facts. Sometimes that is just because they know that something else is going on, or because they are so determined to not let their kids get into a situation that would be dangerous or damaging for their future. Other times parents come in here, fairly composed, and tell us stories of years and years of emotionally and physically exhausting battles to care for their children.

 

When to carry them, when to hold their hand, and when to let them ride their bike down the street. These are the dilemmas of parenthood. And sometimes we need help to figure it out. How do we allow ourselves to let our kids try and fail – without feeling that we are exposing them to dangerous situations? And how to do we manage our own emotions and fears?

 

I am still figuring it out as well.

Are you Whitney Houston’s Money?

What killed Whitney Houston?  Was it drugs?  The world will find out soon from the Coroner.  I would contend, however, that Whitney Houston (Disclaimer:  I was never a fan) died from her money.  She was exploited by producers and media hounds for their own selfish reward and yet she made, and ultimately burned through, millions of dollars with a sordid, drug-addicted lifestyle that ultimately killed her.  There are millions of young people similarly addicted to drugs but they haven’t earned their own money, made successful careers, or accomplished much of anything on their own.  Rather, their lifestyles are underwritten by parents who continue to shell out thousands of dollars each year for their young adult child.  They harbor hope that each new scheme; to go to Community College, or get some certification, or get a low paying job, will be the beginning of change that ultimately never comes.  These parents harbor the fear as well that if they don’t support each new attempt, their child will fall further (maybe) and become worse or do even shadier things to support their addiction (maybe).   But shelling out dollars year after year, in fact, may really be depriving the young person of his right and responsibility to become a healthy, constructive and productive member of society (or not).  Sometimes, desperate parents force their children into expensive rehab stints thinking that somehow 28 days will make the change in their child that they could not.  And it rarely works, except as a business plan for the rehabs.   So parents use their money as a proxy for love in that they “just want their child to be happy and successful” and they are attempting to control the outcome of another adult’s life.  In fact, it sustains the dysfunction.  Parents’ money in these circumstances maintains the young person’s ability to live a lifestyle of drugs, school failure, job loss and on and on.  Parents can get off this treadmill but it requires letting go of the outcome, setting their own boundary and offering a long term plan not a short term fix.

Mattering Matters

from the desk of Lexy Spett  Educational and Therapeutic Consultant

I just finished reading a compelling article from the Science Daily, “For Family Violence Among Adolescents, Mattering Matters”.

Mattering?

Do I matter? Do you see me, recognize me, and value me? It’s that kind of mattering. The kind of mattering that has been the cornerstone of adolescent angst since the beginning of time (or at least since the industrial revolution) and the connective tissue between Donny Darko, Holden Caulfield, all the Twilight movies to Columbine.

Now in a new study led by Brown University sociologist, Gregory Elliott, the need for “mattering” can be tied directly to adolescents and family violence. “Mattering” is the “belief persons make a difference in the world around them” and is composed of three components – 1) Awareness, 2) Importance and 3) Reliance. See me? Value me? Help me?

Elliot sees mattering as the fundamental motivation in human beings. Above all, he says, “there is a need to matter”.

The study found that girls are more likely to hit family members  than boys, Hispanic youths are less likely to be violent in the home, Children from large families tend to be more violent, Religiosity diminishes family violence and children whose parents did post graduate study are more likely to be violent than children whose parents did not finish high school.

The outcomes are interesting and do a good job of dispelling some stereotypes. However, if we reconsider “mattering” as a developmental concept then it means we need to re-evaluate how parents, significant adults and communities demonstrate to our children that they do matter. When kids question their value or purpose, we can not just write it off as adolescent angst. . Its not always attention seeking or manipulation, it is an instinctual directive to feel valued, connected and needed.   Their need to feel connected to their family system and ultimately to the global community is a strong enough drive to create violence either outwardly directed as the study shows or inwardly as the high numbers of teen suicides suggests. So much of our self concept is developed by how we matter and why we matter. The authors of the study believe the “mechanism behind mattering is that it has an effect on both self esteem and on one’s attitude toward violence, which ultimately determines one’s violent behavior”.

So, blog reading community, I ask you -How can we create more opportunities for our children to feel like they matter and how can we reinforce more authentically that they do?

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/04/110418135543.htm

http://jfi.sagepub.com/